<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>My Zen Arcade &#187; foolish</title>
	<atom:link href="http://myzenarcade.com/tag/foolish/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://myzenarcade.com</link>
	<description>There are two kinds of republicans: millionaires and suckers.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Sep 2011 11:41:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Priest: Atheists require reasonable evidence to believe something, therefor they are wrong</title>
		<link>http://myzenarcade.com/2008/06/18/priest-atheists-require-reasonable-evidence-to-believe-something-therefor-they-are-wrong/</link>
		<comments>http://myzenarcade.com/2008/06/18/priest-atheists-require-reasonable-evidence-to-believe-something-therefor-they-are-wrong/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 11:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>moleboy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[christ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[christianity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foolish]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://myzenarcade.com/2008/06/18/priest-atheists-require-reasonable-evidence-to-believe-something-therefor-they-are-wrong/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can&#8217;t say much about this book, and from the interview at least, it sounds like it is primarily critical of anti-religion arguments by atheists, rather than somehow defending the existence of god, which is fine, but the fact is that the sources cited for the existence of Jesus are simply pathetic.  If a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>I can&#8217;t say much about this book, and from the interview at least, it sounds like it is primarily critical of anti-religion arguments by atheists, rather than somehow defending the existence of god, which is fine, but the fact is that the sources cited for the existence of Jesus are simply pathetic.  If a man did all the things that Jesus supposedly did, then there would be much more than these few lines in other historical records.  Some of the referenced works only speak of Christians worshipping Christ, not really on he man&#8217;s actual existence.  Honestly, folks, there&#8217;s more reason to believe in Batman.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.zenit.org/article-22917?l=english">ZENIT &#8211; New Book Debunks Atheists’ Claims</a><br />
<blockquote>
<blockquote>Along with the numerous biblical manuscripts referring to Jesus, pagan writers such as the Roman historian Tacitus, Julius Africanus, Pliny the Younger and Lucian of Samosata all reference Jesus’ existence. The Jewish historical record is equally clear, with the ancient Jewish historian Flavius Josephus and the Babylonian Talmud itself confirming Jesus’ human existence.</p>
<p></p></blockquote>
</blockquote>
<!-- sphereit end --><span style="margin-bottom:40px; border-bottom:none;"><a class="iconsphere" title="Sphere: Related Content" onclick="return Sphere.Widget.search('http://myzenarcade.com/2008/06/18/priest-atheists-require-reasonable-evidence-to-believe-something-therefor-they-are-wrong/')" href="http://www.sphere.com/search?q=sphereit:http://myzenarcade.com/2008/06/18/priest-atheists-require-reasonable-evidence-to-believe-something-therefor-they-are-wrong/">Sphere: Related Content</a></span><br/><br/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://myzenarcade.com/2008/06/18/priest-atheists-require-reasonable-evidence-to-believe-something-therefor-they-are-wrong/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

